Issue: Proposed revisions to
Rule 9N-3.013 necessary to provide criteria for revocation process of an
approved product or entity
Florida Statutes
553.842 Product evaluation and approval.—
(14) The commission
shall by rule establish criteria for revocation of product approvals as well as
revocation of approvals of product evaluation entities, testing laboratories,
quality assurance entities, certification agencies, and validation entities.
Revocation is governed by s. 120.60 and the uniform rules of procedure.
Rule 9N-3
Revise
9N-3.013, Revocation or Modification of
Product Approvals and Entity Certifications, to read as follows:
(1) Product Approval Revocation or Suspension.
(a) Any
product approval shall be revoked or suspended for any of the following
reasons:
1.
Failure to maintain certification, evaluation reports or testing in good
standing with a Commission approved entity which conducted the testing or
comparative or rational analysis, or combination thereof on which the product
approval is based.
2.
Suspension or revocation of the certification, evaluation report or testing
report issued by a Commission approved entity on which the approval is based,
for just cause.
3.
Failure to maintain quality assurance programs for the manufacture of the
approved products as required by this document.
4.
Failure to correct manufacturing deficiencies required to bring the product
within specifications of the originally approved product or alternatively to
demonstrate in a manner consistent with this document, that the product’s
performance complies with the standards established by the Code.
5.
Advertising and sales of the product for uses not consistent with conditions or
limitations of its approval.
6.
Determination that the product was approved based on misrepresentations in the
application for approval.
7.
Failure of the manufacturer to cooperate with a Commission ordered
investigation.
(b) The
Commission may suspend the approval of a product based on any provision of
subsection 9N-3.013(1), F.A.C., until such time as the manufacturer demonstrates
the product is currently in compliance with this document.
(c) The
Commission shall initiate an investigation based on a written complaint
containing substantial material evidence by any substantially affected party.
(d) The
Commission shall clearly post the status of product approvals, denials, or
suspensions on its website, the Florida Building Codes Information System,
www.floridabuilding.org.
(2)
Revocation or suspension of evaluation entity, certification agency, testing
laboratory, validation entity, quality assurance agencies or accreditation body
approval.
(a) The
Commission shall revoke or suspend the approval of any evaluation entity,
certification agency, testing laboratory, quality assurance agency, or
validation entity other than those specifically identified in Section
553.842(9)(a), F.S., for one or more of the following reasons:
1.
Failure to maintain accreditation by a Commission approved accreditation body.
2.
Suspension or revocation of accreditation by a Commission approved accreditation
body for failure to meet Commission accreditation standards or equivalent
pursuant to Rules 9N-3.008 and 9N-3.015, F.A.C.
3.
Determination by the Commission that any requirement set forward in this
document has been violated.
4.
Determination that the criteria for independence from any manufacturer set
forth in Rule 9N-3.009, F.A.C., has been violated.
5.
Determination that the entity is not independent pursuant to Rule 9N-3.009,
F.A.C., of any competing manufacturer of the manufacturer to whom the entity
provided services on which Florida jurisdictions’ product approval is based.
6. An
entity has misrepresented its accreditations or other material information on
its application for approval.
7.
Failure to conduct investigations of products authorized by Rule 9N-3.014,
F.A.C.
(b) The
Commission may revoke or suspend the approval of any approved accreditation
body for failure to maintain accreditation programs which comply with
subsection 9N-3.008(6), F.A.C., or any material misrepresentation of its independence
or substantive information on its capabilities or policies and procedures and
failure to cooperate in investigations of those it accredits.
(c)
Commission suspensions under subsection 9N-3013(2), F.A.C., shall remain in
effect until such time as the entity demonstrates to the Commission that it is
in compliance with said requirement.
(d) The
Commission shall initiate an investigation based on a written complaint
providing substantial material evidence provided by any substantially affected
party.
(e) The
Commission shall clearly post the status of approved evaluation entity,
certification agency, testing laboratory, validation entity, quality assurance
agency and accreditation body approval, suspension or revocation on its website
list of approved entities.
(3) Incomplete Product
Approval or Entity applications. Any
application that has no activity and is not complete within 180 days from the
date of initial filing shall be denied.
(4) Prior to revoking or
suspending an approval, the approval-holder shall be informed in writing of the
Commission’s intention to revoke or suspend his or her approval. The notice shall:
(a) Explain the specific
reasons for the proposed revocation or suspension; and
(b) Provide the
approval-holder an opportunity to demonstrate or achieve compliance with the
product/entity approval requirements.
© Returned undelivered
notice due to invalid contact information available from the BCIS shall be a ground
for archiving said approval.
(5) Upon request, the
approval-holder shall be afforded an opportunity for a hearing.
(6) If a product poses an
imminent hazard to public safety or health, the approval may be immediately
suspended without a written notice of the Commission’s intention to
revoke. The suspension may continue until
the revocation proceedings are completed.
Rulemaking Authority
553.842(15) FS. Law Implemented 553.842(15) FS. History–New 5-5-02, Amended
11-22-06, Formerly 9B-72.160.