ID –
Request |
RESEARCH
TOPIC |
ESTIMATED
COST |
Accessibility TAC |
Project
#1: Definition of the problem: Evaluate the seven Florida Specific items in
the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction and see if the
research shows if the specific items need to be expanded, reduced
or eliminated. Scope
of Work: Conduct literature/statistical review of existing research and data
relevant to subject of concern. (Note:
Access Board, ANSI, public/private universities..etc.
have published research and data on this subject). Expected outcome and impact on the
Code: Provide technical bases for Florida-specific items. Estimated cost: $20,000 |
$20,000 |
Energy TAC |
Project #2: Review of homes airtightness and
ventilation approaches to the FBC. (Also, see attached) Definition of the problem: Provide an update to the 1995 report, which would
include tracking of house airtightness trends since 1995, review of current
recommendations and policies regarding house envelope airtightness, an
overview of mechanical ventilation options for the Florida climate, and
alternative approaches to achieving acceptable levels of ventilation while
avoiding the risks associated with super-tight home enclosures and potential
mechanical system failures. Scope of Work: Review of existing literature, examination of
experimental data and calculations of the energy impacts of using or not
using various types of ventilation systems. Expected outcome and impact on the
Code: From the recommendations of this report, it is expected
that the Florida codes will be modified or adjusted to take into account the
best approaches to energy efficient ventilation, indoor air quality and
occupant safety, and the specific requirements of the Florida climate. Note: The 2013 FBC, Energy Conservation – will require
testing for new dwelling unit to verify an air leakage rate of not exceeding
5 air changes per hour. |
$29,800 |
Energy TAC |
Project #3: Mechanical Code Treatment of Return Air Plenums
and Air Handler Closets in HVAC Change Outs. Staff comment: This proposal appears contrary to new Florida law which prohibits
requirements for existing equipment. |
Not code related |
Mechanical TAC |
Project #4: An Assessment of Energy
Efficient Methods of Indoor RH Control in Florida Housing for Florida Building
Commission Research (Also, see attached) Definition of the Problem: The thermal
efficiency of homes has improved in recent decades. Some of those
improvements have reduced the amount of sensible heat entering the house
(sensible heat is associated with temperature rise while latent heat is
associated with water vapor in the air). Wall and attic insulation, improved
duct insulation, improved windows, and better shading of windows and houses
have reduced sensible heat entry into the home, which can cause the A/C
system to operate less. Reduced A/C operation can lead to a reduction in
water vapor removal, and the potential for an increase in indoor RH. Scope of Wrok: Two tasks are proposed. Task 1: Our research team
proposes to perform a review of literature, examination of experimental data,
and an assessment of the energy efficiency and cost-effectiveness of various
approaches to managing the latent load in homes. Humidity control is not just
a question of which appliance or technology to choose. Task 2. Experiments will be implemented in a highly
instrumented lab facility to assess indoor RH and energy consumption (with
measurement of temperature and humidity, and system energy consumption) that
results from various approaches and equipment types (including a
high-efficiency dehumidifier) are implemented when various levels of
ventilation air are introduced to the space. Expected Outcome and Impact
on The Code: The outcome of this
research will be a report that assesses the pros and cons of various approaches
to indoor humidity control, with a focus on the solutions that are most
energy and cost-efficient. It will address the issue of ventilation and
optimized humidity control. Recommendations will be presented on fixing
problems that cause elevated indoor humidity, approaches to system design,
and selection of systems/technologies that can achieve energy efficient
humidity control. From the recommendations of this report, it is expected
that the Florida codes will be modified or adjusted to take into account the
best approaches to energy- and-cost effective control of humidity in the
Florida climate. |
$54,600 |
Fire TAC |
Project
#5: Evaluate
Draft-stopping performance within Type V combustible concealed attic space. Definition of the problem: Under the SBC, Type VI buildings were restricted to three stories
with 13R sprinkler systems.
Unsprinkled concealed combustible attic spaces did not exceed greater
than the three story limitation in the SBC. Under the IBC, four story
combustible concealed attic spaces are permitted with no fire sprinkler
protection in the attic using 13R system. Even five stories are permitted in
a pedestal type arrangement. This creates a critical reliance on the
performance of draft-stopping to control fire spread in a type V unsprinklered
attic. There have been significant fire event where fires have progressed
into the unsprinklered attic spaces in type V buildings causing the complete
loss of these structures. Attic fire is extremely difficult to fire with
manual fire suppression efforts. The fire performance of the code specified
draft stopping materials in an attic should be reviewed to see if it is
appropriately mitigating the risk as the application has been expanded to
taller structures. Scope of Work: Phase 1: 1. Literature Review Including: 1.
Review of the existing code provisions contained in the IBC on Attic
Draft-stopping; 2.
Review of the history of Attic Drafts-topping initial code
justifications in the SBCCI and ICC; 3.
Review of non-IBC approaches to dealing with fire confinement in
concealed combustible attic spaced; (Non-US Codes) 4.
Review of the evolution of code provisions related to the increased
heights/stories allowed in IBC type V buildings from the SBC to the IBC; 5.
Review of technical literature and available fire testing data
related to fire testing of draft-stopping assemblies; 6.
Review of fire incident data related to attic fires in IBC type V
buildings; 7.
Review of literature regarding manual fire suppression challenges of
attic fires in IBC type V buildings. 2. Conduct a field sampling assessment of existing attic draft
stopping installations in both new and existing type V buildings. 3. Data Analysis and Gap Assessment: Using the information complied
in Task 1 and 2 above, assess what additional information may be needed to
determine if code changes are necessary to the existing attic draft stopping
provisions in the IBC and recommend a methodology for a Phase II study to
fill these gaps. 4. If no additional testing or data is necessary, develop code
changes submittals to that ICC and justification. Phase 2 (Potentially some all or none of these tasks depending on
phase 1 results.)
Phase 1 could be accomplished for less than $25,000. Fire Protection
Engineering firms would most likely be the ones to bid this work. |
$25,000
(phase 1) |
Structural TAC |
Project
#6:
Evaluate the structural integrity of the fastening specification for wood
structural panels currently prescribed in the FBC. (Also, see attached) Definition of the problem: International
Hurricane Protection Association (IHPA) testing conducted in the recent past
indicates there is a problem with the ability of the code specified fastening
schedule to resist the structural loads specified by the Code for opening
protection products. Additionally, it
was discovered during the testing that the fasteners specified by the code
are not readily available in the marketplace. Scope
of Work: Engineering Analysis. The performance of engineering analysis based on a review of the LRWPS and including catenary loading based on the findings of the testing previously sponsored by IHPA2 to develop values for a table that incorporates edge distance on the buck, edge distance on the panel, tensile strength, deflection, end failure, and yielding or over-pulling of the anchors used for attachment of wood structural panels. A test strategy will be developed based on the final calculations considering appropriate safety factors for wood structural panels installed using common anchors that are widely available in the marketplace. 2. Testing Program. We envision a maximum of three tests to validate the data generated in the engineering analysis. A dry test and a wet test using OSB wood structural panels in accordance with the methodology of the LRWPS and a dry test using a plywood structural panel. A Florida Building Commission approved testing laboratory, Architectural Testing, Inc., has submitted a proposal for testing at $2,925.00 per test. (Attached) All testing will be on a wood substrate in accordance with the methodology of the Study and the ATI proposal. Expected outcome and impact on the
Code: The results of the engineering analysis and testing will be used to validate the existing values or develop final recommendations for new table values to replace those of Tables 1609.1.2 and R301.2.1.2 of the Florida Building Code, Building and Residential, respectively. Since previous testing indicates the current schedule is inadequate, the program will result in code provisions that improve the health, safety, and welfare of the public. |
$10,000 |
Structural TAC |
Project
#7:
Determine what types of straps in existing buildings are acceptable for
insurance purposes. Staff
comment:
Outside the technical scope of the FBC. |
Not
code related |
Structural TAC |
Project#8: Definition of the problem: Develop
guidelines for strengthening a room or an area within an existing home
necessary to achieve an acceptable level of protection from severe windstorm. Scope
of Work: Investigate cost effective ways to improve
protection from windstorms. The main
focus of the work is to develop concepts and methods for strengthening a room
or an area within an existing house. Phase
1: Develop methods/concepts necessary to strengthening a room or an area
within an existing house through engineering and good construction practices.
(Projected funds: $20,000) Phase
2: Validate the outcomes from phase #1 using full scale wind testing
analysis. (Projected funds:
$50,000) Expected outcome and impact on the
Code: Provide
retrofit guidelines/concepts for safe room for an existing home. |
$20,000
(phase 1) |
Structural TAC |
Project
#9: Project
to evaluate the efficacy of the AAF Guide and a sample of popular engineering
currently employed in the field with regard to the design and construction of
screen enclosures in high wind events. (Also, see attached) Definition of the problem: Past storms have identified
problems with screen enclosures in high wind events. The AAF has addressed
the problems through scale model wind tunnel testing and extensive
engineering analysis. The testing and analysis led to the development of the
Guide to Aluminum Construction in High Wind Areas (Guide) by AAF and a large
group of engineers practicing in the aluminum industry. The Guide was
subsequently adopted as a prescriptive standard by the Florida Building
Commission within the Florida Building Code. The industry is requesting
assistance in the form of funding to test the efficacy of the Guide and to
evaluate a sample of popular engineering currently employed in the field. We have
discussed the feasibility of such a project with Dr. Timothy Reinhold, PhD,
PE, of the Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety (IIBHS). The
project is considered feasible with the fee for the lab and full scale wind
testing at $16,000.00 per day. The project would consist of full scale wind
testing of two screen enclosures. One screen enclosure would be erected in
compliance with the Guide to Aluminum Construction in High Wind Areas 2010;
the other screen enclosure would be erected in compliance with popular
engineering available today as identified by AAF. AAF agrees to provide all
materials and labor to construct the screen enclosures at the IIBHS facility.
Funds to a maximum of $50,000.00 are sought from the Commission to cover the
costs of the lab time ($32,000.00 for two days), transportation of materials
to the IIHBS facility, and to cover the costs for travel of the construction
crew plus three representatives of AAF. Scope
of Work: The research proposal
is to review erect two full scale screen enclosures attached to a host
structure and test them using a predetermined wind speed. The enclosures will
be tested separately using a uniform wind that follows an open country mean
profile with typical small scale turbulence. AAF is currently discussing the
engineering to be used, but the current thought is to obtain the engineering
from an AAF member for a project that has been issued a building permit and
duplicating the structure. A separate screen enclosure using the same
parameters for size will be designed and built in accordance with the
Guide. (see attached for more details) Expected outcome and impact on the
Code: The data generated by
the testing will be used to: a. Verify or invalidate
current practices. b. If indicated by
tests as needed, modify existing provisions of the Guide and submit for adoption into the
code. c. Explore possibility
of using data garnered to develop provisions for retrofitting existing screen enclosures to
improve their ability to withstand high winds. d. Advise the Florida Engineering community of the results of the
testing. |
$50,000 |
Roofing TAC |
TBD
- Will meet August 22, 2013 |
|