Florida
Building Commission
Roofing
Technical Advisory Committee
Minutes
The meeting was held via teleconference/webinar:
https://suncom.webex.com/suncom/j.php?ED=280371552&UID=492507407&RT=MiMxMQ%3D%3D
Teleconference: 1-888-670-3525 Code: 6062326940
public point of access:
Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Northwood Centre,
Suite 90A, 1940 North Monroe Street, Tallahassee, FL 32399
(850) 487-1824
TAC |
TAC Members Present:
Chairman; Brian Swope, Remington Brown, Jimmy Buckner, Karen Warseck, Mark Zehnal Alternates: Robert
Whitcomb for Chuck Goldsmith TAC Members Absent:
Bob Boyer, Billy Cone, Chuck Goldsmith, Lorraine Ross Guests: Kurt
Gurley- FSEC -University of Florida, Mike Innes-Single Ply Roofing Industry,
Jaime Gascon-County of Miami-Dade, Dwight Wilkes, Sal Delfino, Jeff
White-Palm Beach County Staff Present: Mo
Madani, Marlita Peters, Jim Hammers, Joe Bigelow, Zubeyde Binici, Robert
Benbow, Norman Bellamy |
Ø Objective: To accept Final report on the research project
entitled: Survey and Investigation of Corrosion of Fasteners used to Secure
Roofing Systems and discuss potential future research topics. |
Meeting
Agenda |
|
Objective |
Review
of objectives will included the following:
Description
of issue, discussion by TAC, public comment, Commission action. |
1) |
Welcome
and Opening Remarks: Meeting began at 9:01am with instructions regarding
meeting protocol. |
2) |
Roll Call: Roll was taken a quorum was present. |
3) |
Review and Approval of Meeting Agenda: Motion by Robert Whitcomb, seconded by Jimmy
Buckner to accept the Agenda as posted for today’s meeting. Unanimous vote of approval. |
4) |
Approval of Minutes
of April 3, 2014: Motion
by Jimmy Buckner, seconded by Robert Whitcomb to accept the previous Minutes
of April 3, 2014. Unanimous vote of
approval. |
5) |
Accept Final Report: Research
project entitled: Survey and Investigation of Corrosion of Fasteners used to
Secure Roofing Systems. Mr.
Kurt Gurley provided an online presentation via webinar. The presentation included the survey results
and Mr. Gurley explained the methods used for obtaining those survey results
(i.e. survey questions were established via the assistance of a professional
survey group, University of Florida Survey Research Center, along with input
from [Codes and Standards] staff and Roofing TAC members. The surveys were mailed
with renewal forms via the Board of Construction and Building Code
Administrator’s Licensing Board. The
same survey questions were provided in the membership packet at the most
recent Building Officials Association of Florida Conference held in
Clearwater, Florida in June, 2014.
Also, Mark Zehnal, Director of Technical Services with FRSA, notified
its membership of the survey and encouraged their participation. All of these methods combined resulted in
385 responses out of 1500 solicitations.
Breakdown: 88%-Roofing Contractors, 6.5%-Roofing Inspectors,
1.2%-Building Officials, and 4.5%-Other with an average of 19 years of
experience in the field. Of the 385
respondents 10% worked in the Miami-Dade County, 85% worked within 10 miles
of the coast and 80% reported observing corrosion. The
survey results included a look at types of fasteners, installation processes
and location in proximity to the coast.
Many indicated that the installation process could be a major factor,
as well as, quality control in the manufacturing/distribution processes and
the difference between class 1 and 2 grade fasteners. Several
future research aspects were suggested.
All of which to be discussed after a review by the Florida Building
Commission, should the Commission approve future research and testing. After
discussion, motion was made by Mark Zehnal, seconded by Karen Warseck to
accept the final report as presented. Unanimous
vote of approval. |
6) |
Discuss and recommend
potential research topics for consideration by the Commission Two
recommendations by Mark Zehnal were presented. First to move ahead with the next phase of
research [regarding the fastener corrosion issue] to possibly include field
inspections and to seek input from Professor Gurley as to what direction the
next phase should take. And second to
research the results of using spray polyurethane foam on the underside of
plywood decking as insulation in both residential and commercial structures
in non-vented attic spaces and the resulting deterioration it may be
causing. Mr. Zehnal remarked that Dr.
Miller of the Oakridge National Testing Laboratory has some research, but it
has been suggested that Florida conduct a survey to see if it an issue here,
as well. In
response to the first suggestion, Professor Gurley stated that he would issue
a ‘white paper’ description of the next steps forward for consideration by
the Roofing TAC and the Commission as part of the final report regarding
corrosion of fasteners which will include some of the suggestions made during
this meeting. Regarding
the second issue (spray polyurethane in non-vented attic spaces) suggested by
Mr. Zehnal, Professor Gurley recommended research already conducted by Dr.
David Pravatt of the University of Florida Research Office as a starting
point. Chairman
Swope confirmed that more than one recommendation could be forwarded to the
Commission for consideration and suggested the TAC make a motion to move
ahead with the research on the corrosion issue and move into the testing
phase and also to look into the spray polyurethane issue, as well. TAC
member, Jimmy Buckner, indicated that these projects should be considered
separately and made the TAC aware that [Dr. Pravatt] has three years of
research on the spray polyurethane issue and holding moisture which would be
a strong starting point for this issue and should not be considered together
with the project concerning the corrosion of fasteners. Motion
was made by Mark Zehnal, seconded by Karen Warseck to request of the Florida
Building Commission to move to the next phase of testing and research
regarding the corrosion issue. Vote
was taken with unanimous approval. Motion
was made by Mark Zehnal and seconded by Brian Swope to request of the Florida
Building Commission, future research on the use of polyurethane foam as
insulation in both residential and commercial non-vented attic spaces causing
degradation in the decking. Karen
Warseck suggested that a review of the research already conducted should be
completed prior to moving ahead with any future research. Mr. Madani suggested that Professor Gurley
could discuss this possibility with Dr. Pravatt. Mr. Gurley added that Mr. Madani should
speak directly to Dr. Pravatt for clarity on the research that has already
been completed and from that conversation glean information that would
determine if packaging those results and making recommendations is warranted
or further research is necessary to provide a full report. Chairman
Swope asked that TAC indicate a priority of issues. Mr. Zehnal suggested that the corrosion
issue was already started and should be completed and the second issue is new
regarding the polyurethane foam in unvented attics and will possibly create a
lot of testimony. Ultimately, the
Commission will make the final determination as to how the monies will be
spent and the priority of these issues. Mr.
Madani agreed that this would be relayed to the Commission with these
priorities in mind and suggested that, if anyone else has more information to
provide on either issue, they should relay it to him to be carried forward to
the Commission. Mr. Buckner agreed.
Also, Mr. Zehnal confirmed that the ‘white paper’ on the corrosion
issue would be made available soon so it could be presented to the Commission
along with the TAC recommendation to move forward on the future research and
testing. Vote
was taken with a vote of 5 yes – 1 no with Karen Warseck indicating that
adding a second issue would dilute their proposal to the Commission. With a majority rule, this vote stands
approved to move ahead. |
7) |
General
Public Comment Mr. Dwight Wilkes would like to applaud the TAC
for moving forward on the corrosion fastener issue and would like to suggest
that they hone in on the coastal regions stating that, “There is something in
the code we came across when doing the hurricane response back in the mid-‘90’s
to [Hurricane] Opal. The exposure of
not only fasteners but to clips along the coast and their corrosion. Unfortunately, because the code says that
it is up to the building official, most of the building officials will not
mandate a higher corrosion resistant fastener or clip because of the
costs. So I feel that this is
something that needs to come from this study.
Whether it’s1500 feet, a mile, or the entire state of Florida, it
needs to be set-in and, hopefully, part of the future codes when certain type
fasteners are required, or the location of them. And would really support the real-world
testing that was presented here today and the suggestion that they actually
build and utilize the guns and see how these fasteners, the result of these
fasteners, once they are installed. I think that is definitely needed and I
applaud the TAC for pushing this forward. Thank you.” Doug Wise of Palm Beach County, “echoed Mr. Wilkes
statement. This issue was brought to
us almost two years ago and the failures we were seeing were not surface
corrosion and I just want to make that really clear. Particularly, with ridge vents and ridge
connections where the side of the nail was exposed to the weather. The things had basically rotted out to
nothing and it was like a think wire holding the ridge vent on. So I think this really is an important
issue and I appreciate the TAC’s willingness to look at it and also say that
it is important. So again, you have my
appreciation to Mo and everybody for working on this.” Mark Zehnal stated that, “I appreciate what Dwight
said and it’s a heavy burden on the building official to be put in a position
like that and I think that’s something that we should focus on as a TAC to
come up with some type of guidance through the code to give to the building
officials so there is certainty, not just for them, but for the
contractors. And this will give some
reassurance to the public, as well.
And just like the gentleman
from Palm Beach County said, we have a lot of asphalt shingle roofs put on in
this state. Basically, because it is a
lot more affordable for a lot more people.
However, there are the tile roofs and the metal roofs that are put on,
as well, for residential and it’s something we need to do as a TAC to help
prevent these issues from occurring in the future. So I think that’s the important thing and I
appreciate what Dwight had to say.” |
8) |
General Member
Comment |
9) |
Adjournment: 10:23 A.M. |
|
|
Staff
Contacts: Marlita
Peters, marlita.peters@myfloridalicense.com, (850) 717-1831;
Mo
Madani, mo.madani@myfloridalicense.com, (850) 717-1825.
Note: This document is available to any person
requiring materials in alternate format upon request. Contact the Department of Business and
Professional Regulation, Office of Codes and Standards, 1940 N. Monroe Street,
Suite 90, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0772 or call 850-487-1824 or call 850-487-1824.