SUMMARY REPORT OF PRESENTATION TITLED, “AN OVERVIEW: THE ADVANCED COURSE ACCREDITATION PROCESS’, GIVEN AT THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD MEETING
The Education Administrator gave a one-hour presentation, titled “An Overview: The Advanced Course Accreditation Process”, on September 13, 2006. This presentation was given to approximately 150 training providers and staff, who were attending a Construction Industry Licensing Board meeting in Orlando, Florida. The major topics covered were the following:
The presentation seemed to be well received, with participants expressing an appreciation for receipt of this information. There were questions directed at most of the covered topics, but most were either procedural (about a process) or navigational (relating to moving around within the BCIS). Two perceived issues emanated from the discussion. The first had to do with the newly adopted POC language that states “a minimum of 50% of the actual training materials content had to be code related”. The actual issue relates to the CILB requirement for license renewal, which states that each licensee must take a one-hour advanced course for said renewal. If the 50% language were applied to a one-hour course, then in reality only 30 minutes of the course had to be code related. As stated, the CILB wants their licensees to take a one-hour (60 minutes) advanced course that is code related. The other issue had to do with providers and/or provider/accreditors who develop courses or update parts of current courses, has them appropriately accredited, and then sells them to other providers, specifically, (1) do those developed or updated courses have to be re-accredited and, (2) can the accreditor/provider accredit those courses they developed or updated and then sold to other providers.