Product Approval Administrator (Ted Berman and Associates -
TB&A)
Performance for the August 2013 meeting cycle:
1
2
3
4
5
1.
Choose a Rating: EXCELLENT ---GOOD ---FAIR ---POOR
2.
TB&A were very responsive to our questions
throughout the process. As a company outside
of Florida, we found they were helpful pointing us in the correct direction for
steps
to take for our FL approval update.
6
7
1. Choose
a Rating: EXCELLENT ---GOOD ---FAIR
---POOR
8.
1. Choose a Rating: EXCELLENT ---GOOD ---FAIR ---POOR
2. Is there anything that can be done with the
FPA system and the requirement of sending
in “hard copies” of all evaluation reports to Mr. Berman’s office?
I realize the State of Florida
requires documents to be “compression sealed.” But, if the Florida Product Approval System is sanctioned by the
State as “legitimate”, then what is
the purpose in requiring hard copy submittals of the same documentation uploaded on the FPA site? The uploaded
documents, upon validation, are available to
Mr. Berman’s staff and other state officials for easy access. It seems
redundant and a waste of time
and money (costs to ship these documents to Mr. Berman’s office). In addition, I can’t
imagine the storage requirements on Mr. Berman’s part to store the thousands of documents received during any given FPA
session.
Finally, it almost seems
hypocritical for the below statement to be a part every email from Mr. Berman’s office. While
I realize it is likely not under his purview to make the decision to end the requirement of hard copy submittals
following uploads to the Florida
system, I would believe he might also think it is time to stop this ridiculous requirement. In doing
so, it would be cost effective for all involved (manufacturer, validation, evaluator, Mr. Berman’s office and
ultimately the State of Florida).
I would appreciate it if you would
get this comment to the “powers at be” and see if this could be changed - - maybe it could become effective
with the new 2013 Florida Building
Code’s effective date.
9.
1. Choose
a Rating: EXCELLENT ---GOOD ---FAIR ---POOR
2. I am disappointed with the help that TBA gives to manufactures. All we get are vague answers, and are forced to figure out how to do things on our own. Then later find out that they can be done that way..... From our stand point we are happy to play by Florida’s rules problem is we can’t get any help figuring out how the rules are supposed to be interpreted. We are referred to TBA with no avail. This lack of information frustrates manufactures and discourages them from messing with the entire system. In many cases manufacturers spend more time effort and money on Florida product approvals than they can ever expect to make from the market there. This will likely result in manufactures choosing to not mess with it any more...
10.
1. Choose a Rating: EXCELLENT ---GOOD ---FAIR ---POOR
2. Overall performance I think they get the job done but they lack in customer service and knowledge of the codes and how they are applicable to the product being launched. Would applaud being able to use another firm to guide us while submitting product applications.