Staff Review/Comments of Energy Compliance Software  REM/Rate v15. 9/23/14

 

 

We detailed below issues we feel need to be addressed before this program is sufficient to receive approval for use in determining compliance with the Florida Building Code

 

 

10. In the help files there is no mention of the Florida Building Code or its requirements it only refers to I-Code. We will reference in Florida Energy Code in the code compliance section and What’s New Section and the Introduction.

 

Staff Response: Staff is in agreement with vendor but this has not been implemented.  There is no way to evaluate functionality.

 

NORESCO Response – this indeed has been implemented in the Help System under What’s New

 

 

11. Building Information tab. Under housing type “Number of units” should be labeled with (Apartments Only). Not correct – for whole building multifamily only, not apartments. This is something we could do to say that Number of Units is for whole building multifamily only. Level Type is for apartments only.

 

Staff Response: Staff agrees but this has not been implemented and has not been evaluated for accuracy. 

 

NORESCO Response – this indeed has been implemented in the Building Information Tab for Number of Units

 

12. Building Information tab. Floors on or above grade is confusing; REM Rate should ask for

Number of floors. We could make that change for sure.

 

Staff Response: Staff agrees but this has not been implemented and has not been evaluated for accuracy.

 

NORESCO Response – this indeed has been implemented in the Building Information Tab for Number of Floors

 

 

15. Help screens. Diagrams would be helpful in showing what values relate to a certain building assembly and remove confusion.  Good sections that do this are the help page for Rib and Band Joists.  It would be good to have diagrams for each Building tab.  That is a good idea – we can enhance our help system with pictures for sure. WE have begun this for slabs and foundations.

 

Staff Response: Staff agrees but this has not been implemented and has not been evaluated for accuracy.

 

NORESCO Response – this has been implemented

 

 

21. The REM Rate program does not restrict minimum required R values below Florida Code minimum requirements. For example on the Duct System tab, a duct R-value is allowed to be entered in unconditioned attic that is below R-8.  We are now checking all mandatory requirements for Florida code and highlighting them prior to report viewing.

 

Mandatory Checks

1.   UA Only - Electric Space Heating cannot be used for UA Analysis

2.   UA Only - Air Handlers cannot be in the attic

3.   UA Only - Window Area cannot exceed 20% ( Unless an addition – the have 50% )

4.   All – Equipment Efficiency must be above federal minimums.

5.   All – Air Leakage

6.   All – Maximum Fenestration SHGC (includes overhang exemption)

7.   All – Duct Leakage

8.   All – Mechanical Ventilation

9.   All – Heating/Cooling Equipment Sized  Accordingly

a.    Heating and Cooling Equipment within 1.15 of capacity (warning only)

b.   Efficiencies meeting federal minimums (water, heat, cool)

10. Performance – Ceiling Insulation shall be at least R-19

11. Performance – Duct Insulation R-6 if not fully inside conditioned envelope

 

Staff Response: Staff agrees but this has not been implemented and has not been evaluated for accuracy.

 

NORESCO Response – this has been implemented in all Florida reports that they must pass prior to getting a report.  It shows up in a dialog box prior to the reports and is checked in the source code for each report.  The UA and Performance reports do have different requirements.

 

 

32. Quick Analysis does not show a pass/fail indicator for the Florida Code. The only way to determine this is to run a report to see any Florida Code information.  We could add Florida to QA for sure – that would not be a problem.

 

Staff Response: Staff agrees but this has not been implemented and has not been evaluated for accuracy.

 

NORESCO Response – this indeed has been implemented in Quick Analysis

 

 

 

35. The software seems to lack error checking for mandatory measures when running a performance compliance. A user could enter windows not meeting the area weighted  window SHGC when the overhang is less than 4 feet and still believe that they passed the code. The building inspector would have to catch this on the output.   We are now checking all mandatory requirements for Florida code and highlighting them prior to report viewing.

 

Staff Response: Staff agrees but this has not been implemented and has not been evaluated for accuracy.

 

NORESCO Response – this has been implemented

 

 

41. The solar entry does not include the FEF input which is required by FL Code which states: True, this is not one of the inputs for REM. We have our own calculation procedure for PV and solar thermal.

 

403.4.3.2.3 Solar water heating systems. Solar systems for domestic hot water production are rated by the annual solar energy factor of the system. The solar energy factor of a system shall be determined from the Florida Solar Energy Center Directory of Certified Solar Systems. Solar collectors shall be tested in accordance with ISO Standard 9806,Test Methods for Solar Collectors, and SRCC Standard TM-1, Solar Domestic Hot Water System and Component Test Protocol.

 

Answer – For Florida Compliance – we will not allow credit for solar thermal applications because we do not use the annual solar energy factor of the system.

 

Staff Response: It would be beneficial for the user to have this option.

 

NORESCO Response:  Agreed and we need to rework our solar processor to allow for a Solar Energy Factor rather than a performance curve.  This will require a significant modification to our current solar processor.

 

Additional comments

 

42.) There is an error in the program.  Whenever the print button located in the Quick Analysis window is pressed the program will crash. This was tested on two different PCs.

 

NORESCO Response:  Thank you – will be fixed prior to release of v15