Florida Building
Commission
Plenary Session
December
4th, 2012
Hilton University of Florida Conference
Center
Gainesville, Florida
Legal Report
1.
DS 2012-76 By W. W. Schaefer Engineering & Consulting, P.A. Question 1. Is this large
missile impact rated window (see case 1), with IG impact glass consisting of
non-safety rated glass as the exterior pane, acceptable for installation into
the 10th floor of the building mentioned above or must casement
windows exterior single pane glass be tempered/safety glazed? Answer: For a window as stated in Case
1, the casement window in question must meet the requirements of both section
2410.2(2) and section 2411.1.11 Florida Building Code, Building. This means that the window in question must
be of sufficient strength to resist the small missile impact applications as
outlined in Chapter 16 (HVHZ) and must have an Exterior lite that is safety
glazed. Question 2: Is this large missile impact rated window (see Case 2) ,
with IG impact glass consisting of non-safety rated glass as the exterior
pane, acceptable for installation next to the door as described above or must
the windows exterior single pane of glass be tempered/safety glazed? Answer: For a window as stated in Case
2, the exterior fixed window in question must meet the requirements of both
section 2411.4.3 and section 2411.1.11 of the Florida Building Code,
Building. This means that in addition
to meeting the requirements of Section 2411.1.11, the window in question must
also comply with the safety glazing requirements of Section 2411.4.3 as
applicable. Question 3: Is this large missile impact rated door (see
case 3), with IG impact glass consisting of non-safety rated glass as the
exterior pane, acceptable for installation into the building described above
or must the doors exterior single pane of glass be tempered/safety glazed? Answer: For a door as stated in Case 3, the door in
question must meet the requirements of both section 2411.4.3 and section
2411.1.11 of the Florida Building Code, Building. This means that in addition to meeting the
requirements of Section 2411.1.11, the door in question must also comply with
the safety glazing requirements of Section 2411.4.3 as applicable. 2.
DS
2012-81 by Advanced
Manufacturing & Power Systems, Inc. The Committee voted
unanimously to defer this declaratory statement to the next Structural TAC
meeting. It was determined that further clarification of the
questions is needed. The Petitioner
agreed with the deferral and expressed that he is willing to work with the
staff to further revise the declaratory statement request. 3.
DS 2012-084 by Jose Diaz of MSA Architects,
Inc. (Recommend for dismissal) “Legal counsel
is recommending dismissal of the declaratory statement for lack of
jurisdiction. However, the Order Denying Declaratory statement should
contain a quote of and citation to Section 233.1 2010 Florida Accessibility
Code.” 4.
DS 2012-85 by Door & Access Systems Manufacturers
Association. Question 1: Does the term “protection of openings” mean
the same as the term “opening protection”, as found in the text of the
referenced section, and specific to “protection from windborne debris”? Answer:
Yes, the term “protection of
openings” is analogous to the term “opening protection” as referenced in
Section R301.2.1.2 of the 2010 Florida Building Code, Residential and
specific to “protection from windborne debris.” Question 2: Is the non-glazed door required to comply
with Section R301.2.1.2? Answer: No, Section R301.2.1.2 is specific to glazed products. Question 3:
If the non-glazed door is not required to comply with Section R301.2.1.2, but
it complies with the wind load requirements of the code, would the door also
comply with the code as “opening protection”? Answer: A
non-glazed door is not required to be protected in accordance with Section R301.2.1.2 in a non-HVHZ zone Question 4: Would the state-approved, glazed garage
door rated for non-HVHZ impact resistance be acceptable for the job (which is
outside the HVHZ) without an NOA? Answer: Yes, if used as
per the limits of use of the Product Approval. |
|