FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION
BUILDING CODE SYSTEM ASSESSMENT AD HOC — MEETING I
ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING
October 11, 2005
Orlando, Florida
Rosen Centre Hotel; 9840 International Drive; 1.800.800.9840
Meeting Objectives
To Review and Adopt Ad Hoc Committee's Procedures and Guidelines
To Hear an Overview of Ad Hoc Charge and Scope
To Review Building Code System Assessment Survey Results
To Propose Options for Evaluation
To Evaluate, Rank, and Refine Proposed Options
To Consider Public Comment
To Identify Needed Next Steps and Agenda Items For Next Meeting
Meeting Agenda
1:00 Welcome and Introductions
1:10 Agenda Review and Ad Hoc Committee Plan (J. Blair)
1:20 Ad Hoc's Decision-Making Procedures and Meeting Guidelines (J. Blair)
1:30 Ad Hoc's Charge and Scope (J. Blair)
1:40 Residential Volume Enhancements for Wind Design (R. Dixon)
2:00 Overview of Assessment Survey Results (J. Blair)
2:15 Identification of Options and Related Issues (J. Blair)
2:30 Initial Evaluation and Preliminary Ranking of Options (J. Blair)
3:00 Break
3:15 Evaluation of Options Continued (J. Blair)
4:45 Public Comment (J. Blair)
4:50 Next Steps and Agenda Items for Next Meeting (J. Blair)
Next meeting agenda items, needed information, location, and date
5:00 Adjourn
Contact Information: Jeff Blair; 850.644.6320; jblair@mailer.fsu.edu ; http://consenus.fsu.edu
Meeting Schedule
Meeting I October 11, 2005 Orlando, FL
Meeting II November 16, 2005 Tampa, FL
Meeting III December 6, 2005 Tampa, FL
BUILDING CODE SYSTEM ASSESSMENT AD HOC
PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES
MEMBER'S ROLE
The Ad Hoc's meeting process is an opportunity to explore possibilities. Offering or exploring an idea does not necessarily imply support for it.
Listen to understand. Seek a shared understanding even if you don't agree.
Be focused and concise—balance participation & minimize repetition. Share the airtime.
Look to the Facilitator to be recognized. Please raise your hand to speak.
Speak one person at a time. Please don't interrupt each other.
Focus on issues, not personalities. Avoid stereotyping or personal attacks.
To the extent possible, offer options to address other's concerns, as well as your own.
Represent and communicate with member's constituent group.
FACILITATOR'S ROLE
Design and facilitate a participatory meeting process.
Provide consensus-building and conflict resolution guidance.
Assure that participants follow ground rules—Assist participants to stay focused and on task.
Facilitate public participation and input.
Prepare agenda packets and provide meeting summary reports.
GUIDELINES FOR BRAINSTORMING
Speak when recognized by the Facilitator.
Offer one idea per person without explanation.
No comments, criticism, or discussion of other's ideas.
Listen respectively to other's ideas and opinions.
Seek understanding and not agreement at this point in the process.
THE NAME STACKING PROCESS
Determines the speaking order.
Members raises hand to speak. Facilitator will call on participants in turn.
Facilitator may interrupt the stack (change the speaking order) in order to promote discussion on a specific issue or, to balance participation and allow those who have not spoken on a issue an opportunity to do so before others on the list who have already spoken on the issue.
During the meetings, members will be asked to develop and rank options, and following
discussions and refinements, may be asked to do additional rankings of the options as refined. Members should be prepared to offer specific refinements to address their reservations. The following scale will be utilized for the ranking exercises:
Acceptability Ranking Scale |
4 = acceptable, I agree |
3 = acceptable, I agree with minor reservations |
2 = not acceptable, I don't agree unless major reservations addressed |
1 = not acceptable |