FLORIDA BUILDING
COMMISSION
Code Assembly Ad Hoc
Embassy
Suites Hotel; 3705 Spectrum Blvd, 33612;
813.977.7066
ü
To Review
Agenda
ü
To Hear an
Overview of Issues Regarding Code Assembly
ü
To Identify,
Discuss and Evaluate Options Regarding Code Assembly
ü
To Consider
Public Comment
ü
To Adopt
Recommendations for Submittal to Commission
ü
To Identify
Needed Next Steps and Agenda Items for Next Meeting
All
Agenda Times—Including Public Comment and Adjournment—Are Subject to Change
Meeting
Will Start At Conclusion of Commission Plenary Session
Welcome and Opening
Agenda Approval
Overview of Code Assembly
Issues
2010 FBC Development and
Adoption Schedule
Code
Book Development and Assembly Process
Identification,
Discussion and Evaluation of Issues and Options In Turn
General
Public Comment
Adoption
of Recommendations for Submittal to the Commission
Review of Ad Hoc
Committee Delivery and Meeting Schedule
Next Steps and Agenda Items for Next Meeting
Next meeting agenda
items, needed information/presentations, location, and date
Adjourn
Contact Information and Project Webpage
Jeff Blair; 850.644.6320;
jblair@fsu.edu ;
Code
Assembly Ad Hoc Members
Raul Rodriguez, Chair, Hamid Bahadori, Dick Browdy, Ed Carson,
Kiko Franco, Jim Goodloe,
Dale Greiner, Jeff Gross, and Chris Schulte.
COMMISSION AD HOC COMMITTEE
PROCEDURAL
GUIDELINES
PARTICIPANTS’ ROLE
ü
The Ad Hoc
process is an opportunity to explore possibilities. Offering or exploring an
idea does not necessarily imply support for it.
ü
Listen to
understand. Seek a shared understanding even if you don’t agree.
ü
Be focused
and concise—balance participation & minimize repetition. Share the airtime.
ü
Look to the
facilitator(s) to be recognized. Please raise your hand to speak.
ü
Speak one
person at a time. Please don’t interrupt each other.
ü
Focus on
issues, not personalities. Avoid stereotyping or personal attacks.
ü
To the extent
possible, offer options to address other’s concerns, as well as your own.
ü
Represent and
communicate with member’s constituent group(s).
FACILITATORS’ ROLE
ü
Design and
facilitate a participatory task force process.
ü
Assist
participants to stay focused and on task.
ü
Assure that
participants follow ground rules.
ü
Prepare
agenda packets and provide meeting summary reports.
GUIDELINES FOR BRAINSTORMING
ü
Speak when
recognized by the Facilitator(s).
ü
Offer one
idea per person without explanation.
ü
No comments,
criticism, or discussion of other's ideas.
ü
Listen
respectively to other's ideas and opinions.
ü
Seek
understanding and not agreement at this point in the discussion.
THE NAME STACKING PROCESS
ü
Determines
the speaking order.
ü
Participant
raises hand to speak. Facilitator(s) will call on participants in turn.
ü
Facilitator(s)
may interrupt the stack (change the speaking order) in order to promote
discussion on a specific issue or, to balance participation and allow those who
have not spoken on an issue an opportunity to do so before others on the list
who have already spoken on the issue.
During the meetings,
members will be asked to develop and rank options, and following
discussions and
refinements, may be asked to do additional rankings of the options if requested
by members and staff. Please be prepared to offer specific refinements or
changes to address your reservations. The following scale will be utilized for
the ranking exercises:
The Ad Hoc will seek to
develop a package of consensus-based recommendations for submittal to the
Florida Building Commission. General
consensus is a participatory process whereby, on matters of substance, the
members strive for agreements which all of the members can accept, support,
live with or agree not to oppose. In
instances where, after vigorously exploring possible ways to enhance the
members’ support for the final decision on a recommendation, and the Ad Hoc
finds that 100% acceptance or support is not achievable, final decisions will
require at least 75% favorable vote of all members present and voting. This super majority decision rule underscores
the importance of actively developing consensus throughout the process on
substantive issues with the participation of all members and which all can live
with. In instances where the Ad Hoc
finds that even 75% acceptance or support is not achievable, publication of
recommendations will include documentation of the differences and the options
that were considered for which there is more than 50% support from the Ad Hoc.
The Ad Hoc will develop
its recommendations using consensus-building techniques with the assistance of
the facilitator. Techniques such as
brainstorming, ranking and prioritizing approaches will be utilized. Where differences exist that prevent the Ad
Hoc from reaching a final consensus decision (i.e. with support of at least 75%
of the members) on a recommendation, the Ad Hoc will outline the differences in
its documentation.
The Ad Hoc’s consensus
process will be conducted as an open process consistent with applicable
law. Ad Hoc members, staff, and facilitator
will be the only participants seated at the table. Only Ad Hoc members may
participate in discussions and vote on proposals and recommendations. The
facilitator, or a Ad Hoc member through the facilitator, may request specific
clarification from a member of the public in order to assist the Ad Hoc in
understanding an issue. Observers/members of the public are welcome to
speak during the public comment period provided at each meeting, and all
comments submitted on the public comment forms provided in the agenda packets
will be included in the facilitator’ summary reports.
Facilitator will work
with staff and Ad Hoc members to design agendas that will be both efficient and
effective. The staff will help the Ad
Hoc with information and meeting logistics.
To enhance the
possibility of constructive discussions as members educate themselves on the
issues and engage in consensus-building, members agree to refrain from public
statements that may prejudge the outcome of the Ad Hoc’s consensus process. In discussing the Ad Hoc process with the
media, members agree to be careful to present only their own views and not the
views or statements of other participants. In addition, in order to provide
balance to the Ad Hoc process, members agree to represent and consult with
their stakeholder interest groups.
The Florida Building Commission and the Ad Hoc
encourage written comments—All written comments will be included in the meeting
summary report.
Name:
Organization:
Meeting Date:
Please make your comment(s) as
specific as possible, and offer suggestions to address your concerns.
Please limit comment(s) to topics
within the scope of the Ad Hoc, and refrain from any personal attacks or
derogatory language.
The facilitator may, at his
discretion, limit public comment to a maximum of three-minutes (3) per person,
depending on the number of individuals wishing to speak.
COMMENT:
Please give completed form(s) to the Facilitator
for inclusion in the meeting summary report.